Is it possible to cut children up to a year: omens and superstitions

Oh, and hard life in superstitious people who have recently become parents. Sit down, remember where to put water after bathing your baby, where to hang diapers washed in the evening, how to get around the mirror and so on. Young mothers and fathers attach special importance to the child's hair. And then the grandmothers are pulling up. Straight sacred sect of infant hair is obtained.

So, we are discussing whether it is possible to cut children up to a year. Signs and superstitions also analyze.

Will not speak

One of the beliefs of antiquity says that you can not cut a child up to a year. Saying symbolically you cut the baby’s tongue, it means it’s too late to start speaking.

However, plagued by vague doubts. The baby will begin to speak early if you constantly engage with him. Of course, not a full-fledged occupation, still a baby. But the rituals, rhymes, short tales will be very appropriate.Anyway, the usual conversation gives the child more opportunities for development. Moms who do not speak with children, they begin to talk years to 3. And here the early haircut, if the parents do not communicate with a tiny voice?

My child at 1 year and 5 months was chattering ditties and talked quite tolerably. Although they cut it to zero at 6 months, it was painfully shaggy. Her hair was tangled, she climbed into her eyes and ears, and tangled in her fingers. And all because the whole day my father-in-law chatted with him. Not shut up for a minute. Songs, ditties, rhymes, tales, jokes. It happened that as akyn: what I see, I sing. And the haircut did not affect.

Interesting. There are many signs that require a ban on most actions with the baby. And some of them are somehow connected with speech. Remember that, to a greater degree, everything depends on the parents themselves and the child’s environment. But not from “one grandmother said” or “my great-grandmother gave me a superstition”.

Get scared

And you can gently cut the child with good hairdresser scissors. If at the same time to distract the baby, not to shout, but to amuse him, then most likely the haircut will pass completely unnoticed. The choice is yours.

Interesting. The child is much easier to transfer the first haircut, if you arrange everything in the form of a game. Just do not have now about "he still does not understand." Maybe he does not understand. But it does not entitle parents to treat the crumbs scornfully.

Unhealthy grow

The next superstition tells us that you cannot cut a child before the year, because you are cutting off health. Sorry, this is obscurantism. Well, yes, only an early haircut will steal infant health. And the fact that hygiene, proper feeding, psychological development and other aspects are of decisive importance is not taken into account.

After all, the main thing - do not cut! And now we will look on the other hand. Situation:

• summer
• heat
• your child has long hair

Let's compare these three points, what do we have in the end? Right.Prickling, irritation, blemishes on tender skin, whimpering and capricious child. Hey, mommies, what will you choose? Will or health of your child?

Or another option. Long bangs sprouted, climbs eyes. Well, is it really impossible to cut it in order to stop spoiling the baby's eyesight? Or should one strictly wait for the achievement of the year, and let the kid suffer?

Interesting. Ask any priest of the Christian church. And each of them will say that a child up to the year can be cut if the hairs cause discomfort to the child or threaten health.

Poverty torments

They say that a child cannot be cut before the year is impossible, because the poor will grow up. Yes Yes. Our people are accustomed to blaming anyone and everything, but not themselves.

Sorry, but the causal link between the "early haircut" and "poverty" is not lined up. Wealth comes to clever and hardworking. Sometimes to the evil and cunning. And who knows, who of the current millionaires is still not cut up to a year?

Interesting. There was not a single large-scale study on the relationship of infant haircuts up to a year and the subsequent well-being.Independent experts also refuse to conduct such experiments. The thing is that too many influencing factors will have to be taken into account. And this is too expensive research, not giving any practical results.

Hair will be bad

What is there still threatening popular wisdom? She categorically prohibits cutting a child under one year old, because her hair will grow poorly. And in order for the child to hit everyone with a chic mane in the future, the ritual of cutting off the infant cannon should be carried out strictly at the age of 1 year.

There is a certain rational grain in it. Because if you carelessly cut a baby, for example, with a typewriter or, God forbid, with a razor, you can damage the hair follicles. The fact is that they are still very close to the surface of the skin. Therefore, if you really decided to mow a child up to a year, then do it extremely carefully.

Interesting. Did you know that no type of haircut at any age does not affect the number, thickness and thickness of hair. What mom and dad handed down by inheritance, then on the head and grow.Infant haircut has nothing to do with it. Her Majesty Genetics - this is the defendant for the hair and her condition.

Is it possible to cut children up to a year: signs and superstitions are chosen by each parent themselves. If the hairs interfere with the baby, then stop listening to the grandmother's tales and cut it. What does the child suffer?

If the child lives quietly with long curls, they do not interfere with him, then do not disturb him once again with your hairdresser's zamorochkami. Let the hair be.

Video: Baby's first haircut